Tag Archives: Publishers

No Quirky Writing Need Rot in a Drawer Anymore

Sooner or later it happens to every writer.  The story that’s too weird in characters or plot to get past the sales force of a publisher, or has the wrong word count–too long for a short story sale (10,000 words or more), too short for a novel sale (less than 55,000 words).

It used to be when that happened all one could do was save those stories up for a collection of short stories or let them rot in a drawer.

And then after awhile, one reaches a point where one knows a story is going to be quirky after the first few pages, and an overwhelming urge would hit to just give up on it since there was virtually no market for it.

That’s why I’m so excited about the new distribution systems opening up through Smashwords, Amazon Kindle, and Barnes & Noble’s PubIt.   Writers’ quirky stories are going to be able to see the light of day.   I’m looking forward to seeing what some of my favorite writers do in this new world.

And these days I no longer get the urge to stifle a story after the first few pages, because I know if it’s of publishable quality I can find a home for it, no matter what, down the road.  No story I write need sit rotting in a drawer–unless (like the first novel I wrote) it ought to.   Bad writing is still bad writing in this new world.

More Interesting Links on the Writing Business

Here’s more interesting links I’ve found or been told about…

1) Fascinating article by the LA Times on the legal slugfest going on about THE SHACK.  Get a load of this mess:

It wasn’t until Hachette came around that Windblown Media and Young even put their publishing agreement in writing….

The dueling lawsuits have left Hachette in an awkward position. If they pay Young additional royalties, Windblown might file suit to reverse that decision. But if they continue to pay Windblown according to the terms of the original contract, Young might also press on with additional litigation.

In the first quarter of 2010 alone, “The Shack” earned nearly $1 million in royalties, with more money accruing daily. So on May 11, Hachette filed its own lawsuit in federal court, stating in its filing that “as a result of disputes that have arisen … [Hachette has] a real and reasonable fear that distributing the funds would expose Hachette to multiple claims and liabilities.”

It’s well worth it to take the time to read the entire article.

Moral of the story–learn the business basics of publishing, and make sure you have a written contract with your business partners, or this could be YOU.

2) Maureen Johnson has written a Manifesto on her blog that is worth reading since it raises the question of how far to go in marketing oneself as a writer.  Here’s a small snippet (go read the whole thing):

I hear this almost everywhere I go where there are people talking about social media, and I feel that it is time that I rise up against it. In fact, I did, right there and then. I grabbed the microphone from her grasp and said, “I am not a brand.”

3) Toni McGee Causey’s “How Do You Know When to Quit?” deals with the question  most writers ask themselves at least once during their journey.

4) And there’s a handy tip on contract negotiations with publishers in this article by Marjorie Kehe, “How Greg Morteson Outsmarted His Publishers.”

Interesting links on the writing business

Check out Douglas Smith’s Foreign Markets for selling speculative short stories.  This is a unique list of non-English markets.  Make sure to read his guidelines if you decide to submit to these markets.

There’s a fascinating article about how literary agent Andrew Wylie runs his business, written by Craig Lambert at Harvard Magazine.

And Cory Doctorow has an update on his self-publishing experiment (and he continues to share the income and expense numbers), at Publisher’s Weekly as “New York, Meet Silicon Valley.”

J. A. Konrath on Ebooks

Unless you don’t follow publishing news, I’m sure you’ve heard about J. A. Konrath signing a major deal with AmazonEncore. I advise reading about it at his blog since Publisher’s Weekly got some of the basic facts wrong .

Also, he’s well-known in e-publishing circles because of his candor in blogging his actual sales numbers on the Kindle since he started self-publishing there. There’s been a lot of handy information on his blog since he’s experimented with different approaches–like better book covers and changes in pricing–and I know he gathered it up for THE NEWBIE’S GUIDE TO PUBLISHING. I’ve downloaded it, and will try to find time to read it this summer to review here.

He’s getting swamped with emails from writers asking questions about e-publishing, so he just did a blog on “Top Ebook Questions.” I think it’s a good place to start exploring this new revenue stream for writers.

Dean Wesley Smith on the myth “only 300 writers make a living.”

If you haven’t heard about it already, go check out Dean Wesley Smith’s latest post on the myth that “only 300 writers make a living writing fiction.”

That one never made sense when one looked closely at the numbers in Publisher’s Weekly or dug around a bit in the industry. Do all fiction writers make a living? No. But more do than 300.

Dean has been a fiction writer, editor, and publisher over the decades, which makes it fascinating to watch him crunch the numbers to stomp all over this myth.

And make sure to read all the comments over the next week or two, should be good stuff as various people weigh in.

Helpful Articles on Book Covers

Laura Resnick has a terrific series of five articles on book covers on her website under “A Book By Its Cover.” Considering the significant impact a good or bad cover can have on book sales in stores (especially if the reader doesn’t know who you are), it’s well worth the time to read these.   Here’s her summary of what the articles cover:

I: Cover Karma
How does a book’s cover affect sales, and consequently a writer’s career? Why are some books (and some writers) uniquely blessed or cursed? What did a publisher do right (or wrong) with regard to a given cover? How do publishers ensure success (or stumble into disaster) when planning a book’s cover?

II:  Green Books Don’t Sell
Yesterday’s conventional wisdom becomes today’s common misconceptions as art directors from New York’s major publishing houses explain the step-by-step process of giving a book a cover.

III:  But I Wrote the Damn Thing!
If author input were actively desired in the cover process, somebody would have mentioned it by now. Nonetheless, there are constructive, productive, and useful ways for an author to contribute to the cover process; there are also contractual ways to gain influence over this process.

IV: Steal This Cover!
Next to word of mouth, the cover is the single most important means by which an author reaches new readers. Find out how this has led to increasingly ruthless and volatile competition among publishers, and why people who don’t even read often have more influence over a book’s cover than the author, the editor, the cover artist, or the art director.

V:  Worth A Thousand Words
A profile of three illustrators: sf/f cover artist Michael Whelan, winner of many Hugo, Howard, and Chesley Awards; romance cover artist Pino, with over 1,500 covers to his credit; and Janny Wurts, a bestselling sf/f novelist who is also an award-winning cover artist.

Richard Curtis’ HOW TO BE YOUR OWN LITERARY AGENT

For this commentary, I’ll be referring to the 2003 revised version of HOW TO BE YOUR OWN LITERARY AGENT by Richard Curtis.   Curtis is a NYC literary agent who has run his own agency since the 1970s, and been in the publishing industry even longer than that.   He’s also got some experience as a published writer as well.

The main goal of the book is to encourage writers to be more educated about contracts, marketing, what agents do, and the publishing industry as a whole.   He encourages writers to find an agent, but wants them to be able to tell if the agent is doing a good job or not.  And also, he’s aware there are markets (such as small presses), where it may be next to impossible to find a good agent to represent a writer.  So this book tries to fill in a few of the knowledge gaps.

I found the Appendix “Is It a Good Deal?” invaluable.  Here he has a checklist, from an agent’s perspective, of what he considers  a “poor,” “fair,” or “good” deal from a NYC publisher.  Rights granted, advance amounts, royalty rates–it’s all listed.   I would want to double-check with other resources such as Publisher’s Marketplace for more recent data, but the appendix is a handy place to start.

I also found very helpful the chapters where he goes through a publishing contract from an agent’s perspective (i.e. what he looks for). In particular the chapters on “Negotiation,” “The Basic Deal,” “Warranties and Indemnities,” “Permissions,” “The Option Clause,” “Termination and Reversion of Rights,” and “Royalty Statements” made this a book I wanted to buy to put on my reference shelf. Even though much is changing in the publishing industry, some fundamental issues have not.

This book alone is not enough to understand all that goes into a publishing contract, I’d still need to hire a literary attorney or agent to read over any NYC publishing contract I encountered. But now I know what questions to ask and what major pitfalls to watch out for.

Also, throughout the book are tales about the foibles of the publishing industry, which I found fun to read since Curtis has decades of experience to share.

For an excerpt, I’ll share some words of encouragement he wanted to give to writers:

So you mustn’t be discouraged if your first book or books don’t take off into the wild blue yonder….few blockbusters are first books.  Rather, they are the culmination of years of dedication to craft, and a number of flops or indifferent successes….Do what you can to make your book succeed, but after you’ve done all you can, go back and write another, and another after that, and yet another after that.

Epic discussion about “Agents Know Markets” on Dean Wesley Smith’s website

If you haven’t been reading Dean Wesley Smith’s “Killing the Sacred Cows of Publishing” posts, you’ve been missing out.  There’s an epic discussion going on right now about the topic of “Agents Know Markets.” Make sure to read the entire comments section, for Laura Resnick and Dean Wesley Smith go over 20 years of experience in the fiction writing business there in long comments.  Almost as good as sitting next to them in a bar while they chat.

Here’s a small sample of his article.  But go read the entire thing!   In this section he’s explaining that “Agents are human.”

See, the real truth about publishing is that it only takes one. Put that phrase over your marketing desk. IT ONLY TAKES ONE.

One editor to fall in love with your work, to push your work through all the roadblocks in a publishing house, to turn an unlikely book into the next bestseller. But if you have to run everything through the “taste meter” of your employee, you are adding a second level of acceptance to a book that often makes selling just flat impossible. It is hard enough in this business to have one person fall in love with your book, it’s damn near impossible to have two in a row. So by following an agent’s “taste meter” you are dooming a lot of work.

As a special bonus in this post, Smith and Resnick discuss how to survive as a fiction writer until you can find a good agent.

Pushcart’s COMPLETE ROTTEN REVIEWS AND REJECTIONS

I think what I love most about Pushcart’s COMPLETE ROTTEN REVIEWS AND REJECTIONS, edited by Bill Henderson & Andre Bernard, is that it lifts the veil of mystery between writers and the publishing world, and shows us just how human we are all are despite our attempts to become omniscient.   Mistakes get made.  Critics and editors get cranky and misunderstand an important book.  Writers insult other writers.

Any writer who is feeling timorous about submitting his or her work should consider reading this book.  Reading the nasty reviews and rejections other writers have received was an excellent antidote for self-pity.  The book also provides a peek into history, since Bill Henderson made an effort to include rotten reviews going as far back as 411 BC.

I don’t want to spoil the fun of what is inside, so instead I’ll quote from the back cover:

Alice in Wonderland was greeted with “a stiff overwrought story.”  Reviews of Moby Dick cited Melville for “tragic-comic bubble and squeak.”  Classic rejection slips were delivered to John Le Carre’s The Spy Who Came In from the Cold: “You’re welcome to Le Carre–he hasn’t got any future,” and Vladimir Nabokov’s Lolita: “I recommend that it be buried under a stone for a thousand years,”…

My one gripe is that the book has no index, and since the excerpts are not arranged chronologically or alphabetically, I have to randomly flip around to find the author or quote I’m looking for.

This book combines the three separate Pushcart editions of ROTTEN REVIEWS, ROTTEN REVIEWS II, and ROTTEN REJECTIONS.  So you’re getting three books for the price of one.  A great bargain.

Literary Agent Kristin Nelson on Harper Studio and Vanguard Press

Literary agent Kristin Nelson has a helpful post on Harper Studio (HS) and Vanguard Press (VP), and how the contract terms for them differ from the typical author-publisher contract.   Go read the entire post for all the details.   But here’s a snippet:

I’m wondering if the editor was erroneously comparing Harlequin Horizons to a legitimate publisher such as Vanguard Press or Harper Studio.

They are not remotely the same.

At Horizons, the writers are forced to pay for their work to be “published.” And forced to pay for “marketing” or anything else from a fee-oriented “menu” of choices. The writer foots the entire cost.

At VP and HS, the publishers pay for publication. The authors are not out any money from their pockets. Vanguard and Studio also commit a certain percentage of monies to the marketing/promotion as part of the plan. In lieu of the advance, there is an equal split of royalties between Publisher and Author.

And another key factor, at VP and HS, the books are available for wide distribution via traditional sales outlets just like a traditional publisher.

There is also an interesting post by one of the commentators, Lisa Dez, about Smashwords.

Happy Thanksgiving!  :)